Oil Spill Crude Disaster

Sep 29, 2010 3:33 PM

Researchers High in Demand Due to BP Oil Spill

NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Once a backwater in the world of
oceanographic research, the Gulf of Mexico has suddenly become the
site of a scientific gold rush, all because of the BP oil spill.
The environmental disaster represents a once-in-a-generation
research opportunity that has oceanographers salivating. There's
big money - $500 million from BP alone - up for grabs. And for
scientists who usually toil in near-obscurity, there's the prospect
of lots of media attention.
Researchers are suddenly in demand, with more than 100 hired
guns on the job. BP has signed up nearly 50 scientists to help
defend it from legal action. The federal government has its paid
experts, and so do attorneys suing BP. Environmental activists have
their own research vessels and scientists.
At least 165 proposed studies are registered through a federal
clearinghouse. Some crucial supplies - such as boats - are hard to
find.
"We've never had this many research vessels concentrated in the
Gulf at any one time - never," said Larry McKinney, director of
Gulf of Mexico studies at Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi.
"It's been a flat-out crazy time."
To try to bring order to what's going on, scientists studying
the spill from around the country will gather in Florida on Oct. 5
at the request of the White House science office to talk about
coordination and priorities. Also in the next week or so, Gulf
states are expected to complete an agreement on how to hand out the
$500 million in BP-pledged research money over the next decade.
The Gulf of Mexico has gotten relatively little federal research
support in the past. In the 20 years before the oil spill, the
Great Lakes received more than $1 billion, while the Chesapeake Bay
got just shy of half a billion. Spending for the same time period
on the much-larger Gulf of Mexico: $85 million.
"It's the hardest working of our ocean basins, but it's the
most underfunded in terms of research monitoring and science,"
said Florida State University oceanographer Ian MacDonald.
That's changing because of the worst offshore oil spill in U.S.
history.
Hour after hour on a hot and windy September day, biologist Eric
Hoffmayer bounced over choppy Gulf waters in a fishing boat,
hunting for whale sharks - one species among many that scientists
are studying to measure how the spill has affected people and the
environment.
Hoffmayer, of the University of Southern Mississippi's Gulf
Coast Research Laboratory, is among the fortunate scholars who have
snagged funding. He has had more luck landing money than whale
sharks, at least on this outing, when none turned up.
"There's multiple sources of funding out there. You just have
to know how to tap into it," Hoffmayer said.
Two major types of research are taking place, and they often get
confused by the public.
One involves basic inquiries into questions such as where the
oil has gone and what it means for the ecosystem, food web and
public health. That is where BP has pledged to spend a half-billion
dollars, with all findings to be made publicly available.
The other type of research supports the federal government's
natural resource damage assessment, or NRDA, a part of the legal
battle that eventually will determine how much money BP will pay
for restoration.
In the NRDA process, both sides have hired experts and pledged
them to secrecy.
"It is standard practice to ask such a litigation expert to
maintain the confidentiality of communications with legal
counsel," BP spokesman Tom Mueller wrote in an e-mail.
Likewise, the government may keep some data in this process
secret, said Steve Murawski, chief fisheries scientist for the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA has 17 damage
assessment teams working the spill, he said.
Under the 1990 oil spill law written after the Exxon Valdez
disaster, both sides hire scientists, economists and attorneys and
collect data in a legal process designed to "make the public
whole" for loss of natural resources. Billions of dollars are at
stake with court fights likely to go on for years.
But that's only a fraction of the research that's going on,
scientists said. It's the general research money - including BP's
half-billion - that most are seeking. The only stipulation from BP
is "the data is shared publicly when the results are in," Mueller
said. Researchers and deans at several universities confirmed this.
"At one point I was sorely tempted to give the money back
because frankly I didn't want the sea lab associated with BP
money," said Dauphin Island Sea Lab director George Crozier. But
when he saw there were no strings, he accepted the money.
So far, $40 million of it has been given to four large academic
institutions in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and the
National Institutes of Health, which then divided it among dozens
of researchers. In Florida, 233 proposals competed for $10 million
in grants with only 27 getting funded.
The Gulf of Mexico Alliance, a consortium of state officials, is
setting up a more permanent process for distributing the remaining
$460 million from BP.
Some say still more is needed.
"I don't think $50 million a year is enough to study the
problem as we know the scope of it," NOAA's Murawski said.
Environmental groups are getting into the act. Greenpeace
dispatched its 164-foot research ship Arctic Sunrise for a
three-month tour of the Gulf, where it is hosting university
scientists for a variety of spill-related studies and collecting
water samples.
The funding scramble has created a geographical rift. Scientists
in the Gulf region contend they should get most of the money
because they know the area better and have been shortchanged in the
past. Those from elsewhere say grants should be awarded on the
basis of researchers' credentials and the worthiness of their study
proposals.
"It's in our backyard," said William Hawkins, director of
Southern Mississippi's Gulf Coast lab. Many scientists in Gulf
states believe "this is our time, this is our spill," he added.
There's a sense of urgency behind the push for funding. Ideally,
scientists would have taken measurements before, during and after
the spill to see how the ecosystem changed. Their efforts were
hampered for months by a shortage of vessels and poor access to the
spill area as the government and BP focused on plugging the leak.
Now, the oil is becoming harder to find with each passing day.
Chris D'Elia, dean of Louisiana State University's School of the
Coast and the Environment, said: "This is like trying to do
forensic work on a very old crime scene - the murder occurred
months ago, the body's decayed and animals walked off with the
rest."

»Comments

»Topics in this article

Top Videos

1 2 3 4

Most Popular